How cool is it to publish actresses, no men, without makeup and without their hair well groomed? I think it’s a disgrace to go out of your way to find these actresses looking as unattractive as possible, then publishing their picture under a title of “15 surprising photos of celebrities without makeup”. I just came across such an article under “SheBudgets” that listed Brook Shields, Charlize Theron, Jennifer Hudson, Calista Flockhart, Maria Shriver, Alicia Silverstone, Sharon Osborne, Rosanna Arquette , Renee Zellweger, Pink, Melanie Griffith, Kirstie Alley, Kelly Ripa, Kelly Clarkson, and Christina Applegate. Some of them didn’t even look bad, in my opinion. Who fault is this anyway? Are we so nosy that we have nothing else to do but sit around looking into the lives of the rich and or famous? It’s sort of like buying stolen jewelry or stolen anything. The thieves steal it, then tries to unload the property on the streets. We buy the stolen goods because we are getting something for nothing, so to speak. This causes the thieves to continue stealing because there are always buyers. The Paparazzi snaps the pictures and sells it to the highest bidder among the newspaper and magazine hounds, then we buy it, making much money for the magazines and/or newspapers, which I like to call “ragweeds”. These purchases cause the Paparazzi to continue invading the private lives of celebrities. Every job has hours. If a celebrity is not working then they should be off limits to the Paparazzi. Taking unflattering pictures of the stars truly sucks. Some say that’s the price of being a star — I say that’s the price of our nosiness!